Richard C. Wesley: Voting and Opinion Patterns on the New York Court

Title

Richard C. Wesley: Voting and Opinion Patterns on the New York Court

Description

Professor Vincent M. Bonventre analyzes the voting practice of New York Court of Appeals Judge Richard C. Wesley in both criminal and civil cases. A contradiction presents itself when this record is looked over: while Judge Wesley is stanchly conservative in his criminal voting history—that is, he votes in favor of the prosecution—his civil record reflects a propensity towards civil liberties. Indeed, Judge Wesley votes almost three times as often in favor of individual rights or entitlements in civil cases than he did in criminal ones. While his civil record can hardly be considered “liberal”, it has liberal leanings. This conflict is reviewed in detail from both the lens of criminal and civil cases.

Publisher

Albany Law Review

Date

2003

Format

PDF

Language

English

Bibliographic Citation

Vincent Martin Bonventre, Todd A. Ritschdorff & Erika L. Bergen, Richard C. Wesley: Voting and Opinion Patterns on the New York Court - Center for Judicial Process, 66 ALB. L. REV. 1065 (2003).

Files

Citation

Vincent M. Bonventre, Todd A. Ritschdorff, and Erika L. Bergen, “Richard C. Wesley: Voting and Opinion Patterns on the New York Court,” Albany Law Faculty Scholarship, accessed May 6, 2024, https://albanylaw.omeka.net/items/show/109.